If you have got the luxurious of figuring out, you’re squandering the chance by walking into the gym and not using a plan. To avoid wasting your time with marginally effective training, you have to get organized. You wish a plan.

Credit: MDV Edwards / Shutterstock

A workout split (also called a “training split” or just a “split”) provides order to your lifting schedule over the course of per week. There are splits that train your entire body, head to toe (or traps to calves) in each session, some splits work each individual body part by itself, after which there are numerous combination in between.

We’ll break down probably the most common splits and assist you to find out which is best suited to your goals.

Perfect Splits 

Common Workout Splits

Put simply: A workout split is jargon for the way you divvy up your week’s price of coaching. Similar to there are a large number of exercises to select from, there are many different training splits to set the framework of your training week. While some splits share overlapping advantages, or hindrances, each is perhaps the precise alternative depending in your specific goal, individual needs, and other deciding aspects.

Body Part

Because the name implies, this split is characterised by specializing in a selected body part or muscle group with each workout. Although many variations on the body part split are possible, the “bro split” is most generally known — per week typically looks like:

Specializing in one body part at a time allows for a wide range of exercises. For instance, one might hit bench press, incline bench, and cable crossovers on chest day; or barbell curls, hammer curls, and a wide range of direct triceps training as an arm workout. Typically, each body part receives a single training session per week. 

That is a well-liked split amongst bodybuilders — competitive and hobbyists — as a body part split delivers more volume to the muscle, which is a requirement for hypertrophy (or muscle growth). 

Upper/Lower

This can be a two-way split. All upper body lifts are performed on day every body lower body lifts are done on day two. The upper/lower split is usually repeated twice per week, which might allocate 4 days to lifting and three days of “rest” (either non-lifting activity or total rest).

Credit: Roman Chazov / Shutterstock

For prime-frequency devotees, advanced trainees, and people pushing for brief periods of over-reaching, the upper/lower split will be repeated thrice per week with a single rest day. The upper/lower split, due to this fact, allows either two or three workouts per major muscle group each week.

Trainees will perform fewer exercises per muscle group per workout in comparison with the body part split. As an alternative of doing three to 4 chest exercises, you might perform two. Nevertheless, since you’re training your entire upper body and lower body twice (or, in extreme cases, thrice) weekly, the general volume stays concerning the same.

Push/Pull/Legs

That is one other common option for physique-focused lifters, in addition to those prioritizing strength. On day one, the lifter hits upper body pressing movements and triceps accessory exercises — bench press, overhead press, skull crushers, etc.

Day two includes upper body pulling — deadlifts, rows, pulldowns, curls, and company. All lower body training is reserved for day three, which is basically “leg day” for training the quadriceps, hamstrings, and calves.

The push/pull/legs split could also be repeated twice per week, which might allow a single day for “rest,” or it might be performed with a rest day between each workout. Major muscle groups are trained a couple of times per week within the push/pull/legs split. 

Chest & Back/Legs/Shoulders & Arms

Here’s a singular three-way split. One advantage it offers is the flexibility to integrate agonist-antagonist supersets, a time-efficient programming technique that alternates exercises which goal muscle groups on directly opposite sides of the body (like chest and back). For instance, you’d perform one set of bench presses followed by a set of rows.

This split is usually performed a couple of times per week. Due to this fact, each muscle group is directly trained a couple of times per week. You must recognize, nonetheless, that shoulder and arm muscles are inclined to get “bonus” training volume because they’re not directly trained and unintentionally recruited through the chest and back workout. 

Total Body

Whole-body routines aren’t technically “splits,” because they don’t divide training by body part or movement pattern. All major muscle groups are trained each session. Whole-body training is a comparatively common solution to train for serious athletes and beginners alike.

Credit: Jasminko Ibrakovic / Shutterstock

Three whole-body workouts per week is standard, but some lifters get by with two or 4, depending on their recovery ability. As you would possibly expect, training the whole body doesn’t leave much time for “fluff,” redundancy, or isolation work.

Whole-body routines are inclined to emphasize big multi-joint exercises with minimal accessory exercises. While some trainees hit whole-body workouts 4 or more times per week, the standard whole-body training frequency is thrice per week with 24 hours or more recovery between sessions.

All Roads Result in Rome

If you happen to are consistently hitting the iron and training each muscle group hard — even just a couple of times per week — you’re virtually guaranteed to make gains. (1)(2) (Your weight loss plan must be in check, too.) Although many variables play relatively smaller roles, the key drivers of adaptations to resistance training are intensity, or the quantity of weight lifted, and weekly volume (the full variety of sets and reps). (3)

Broadly, your workout split is a technique of determining frequency. Frequency will be defined as the full variety of workouts per week or, on this case, the full variety of sessions each muscle group is trained per week. (2)

Credit: antoniondiaz / Shutterstock

Working on adding muscle mass or boosting strength? Dozens of coaching studies indicate that per-muscle-group training frequency doesn’t significantly affect hypertrophy and strength when intensity and volume are held constant.(2)(4)(5)(6) Meaning, if all else is equal, your split shouldn’t “theoretically” matter.

More considering fat loss? Simply adding resistance training is prone to improve body composition. (7) This effect is strong enough to occur within the absence of weight-reduction plan and across a big selection of programming variables (e.g. volume, intensity, frequency of exercise). (7) Though, dialing in your weight loss plan would only expedite and enhance your progress.

It does seem any road will get you to ancient Rome, but wouldn’t you like to reach looking more like a Spartan than an Athenian? (Historical spoiler alert: Yes, you’ll.)

For exceptional results, simply “making gains” isn’t enough. You’re searching for probably the most efficient path to the very best possible improvement, and also you’re going to want the very best possible workout split to your needs. 

Linchpins of Adaptation

Many aspects definitely interact to find out the effectiveness of a program. For hypertrophy — constructing more muscle — volume (weekly sets x reps) appears to be a very powerful programming variable to maximise. (3)(8)

Credit: Gorodenkoff / Shutterstock

Training intensity (weight/load or nearness to muscular failure) is the crucial driver when strength is the priority. (9) Volume earns an honorable mention, because it is a more necessary determinant of strength adaptations than frequency. (4)(5)(6)

For fat loss goals, volume and intensity interact to stoke the metabolism during training and burn extra calories after training via the EPOC phenomenon. (10) Training major muscle groups often in periods of weight-reduction plan may even speed up improvements in body composition by promoting fat loss and muscle gain. (11)

Let’s consider how specific workout splits can assist you to maximise the important thing variables to your goal. 

The right way to Select the Best Split for Your Goal

If you need to use a body part split, push/pull/legs, or chest & back/legs/shoulders & arms split but can only get to the gym twice per week, you’re going to go away body parts neglected and potential gains unrealized.

The primary query when identifying a great workout split ought to be, “What number of strength training workouts per week am I in a position to realistically perform?” Don’t force a square peg right into a round hole. Your training split will only be effective to the extent to which it gets done.

Credit: nkotlyar / Shutterstock

If you happen to can only train once per week, you’re on the full-body split. End of conversation. Go train all the things, enjoy your workout, rest rather a lot, and are available back again next week. There’s simply no other effective option for these desperate times.

If you happen to can train twice per week, whole-body routines and upper/lower splits are potential options. That is how you’ll be able to make the very best of a near-minimal situation.

If you happen to can train three to 4 times per week, your options divulge heart’s contents to at the least one cycle of any of the common splits except the body part split. To avoid neglected areas, body part splits ought to be reserved for trainees who can commit at the least five days per week within the gym.

Ultimately, for those who can train six days per week, the world of splits is your oyster. When you’ve explored your schedule demands, you understand your potential split options. Now, it’s time to discover the linchpin programming features to your training goal — probably the most essential determinants of success and discover a training split that maximizes them. 

Workout Splits for Hypertrophy

As previously established, weekly volume is a key determinant of muscle growth. Although training frequency doesn’t appear to affect outcomes when volume is equal, a split program that facilitates more volume each week could also be simpler for hypertrophy. (2)(3)(8)

So, how much volume per muscle group should one shoot for? And the way can they best achieve this goal? Expert consensus maintains a minimum of 10 sets per muscle group within the six to twenty rep range is a viable goal for hypertrophy training. (12)

Although there’s potential for much more significant improvement if the extra volume is achieved, not more than 10 sets per muscle group ought to be programmed in a given session. (12)

Credit: MDV Edwards / Shutterstock

From here, deciding your split is about easy arithmetic and a slight personal preference. A lifter can hit the bottom suggestion of 10 sets by training with a body part “bro” split. Note that 10 hard sets per body part won’t tickle — especially on leg day with (presumably) 10 sets for quads, 10 for hamstrings, 10 for calves.

Intermediate and advanced trainees can typically tolerate a body part split because they’ll get an entire week to get well before hitting the identical muscle group again. The downside is that this split can quickly hinder volume progression if the ten sets per day maximum warning is observed.

Whole-body split practitioners can get away with doing a moderate volume (e.g., three to 4 sets) of all the things three days per week. This quickly becomes a protracted and arduous workout but will be completed more efficiently if agonist/antagonist or alternate peripheral superset techniques are employed.

Split training is popular amongst bodybuilders and sure for a superb reason. An entire-body approach has been marginally less effective for hypertrophy than a volume-equated split routine. (13)

Hitting the gym 4 or six times per week on an upper/lower split will be very effective for hypertrophy. Nevertheless, seeing too many “leg days” on the schedule will be demoralizing for a selected subset of the lifting population (i.e., the would-be skippers of leg day). And no split is effective for those who’re skipping out on it. 

The push/pull/legs or chest & back/legs/shoulders & arms splits are also highly effective for hypertrophy. Mentally, every day has a goal — to “pump and annihilate” a given muscle or muscle group. These splits have the added advantage of facilitating time-saving and effective agonist/antagonist superset techniques. 

Workout Splits for Strength

In comparison with a volume-matched split routine, a whole-body routine at 4 sessions per week frequency has been shown to end in superior strength gains. (13)

Now, the differences in strength improvement between groups were small and failed to succeed in “statistical significance” for many measurements. But this finding is odd, considering that meta-analyses have reported “no difference” between volume-equated training when training frequency is manipulated. (4)(5)

Perhaps there are neurological or endocrine advantages to the whole-body training stimulus? We don’t know. But we do know this — strength training is basically intensity-driven.

A split that offers each workout an outlined focus anecdotally allows the lifter to perform with higher intensity. So, in case your intensity has been slipping toward the tip of your whole-body routine, it’s time to contemplate a split.

Ivan Kochergin / Shutterstoc

A movement pattern-based split like push/pull/legs works great for some. For others, upper/lower provides each workout with enough focus to maximise each lift.

Workout Splits for Fat Loss

Whole body routines are inclined to concentrate on multi-joint exercises targeting large muscle groups. To coach all major muscle groups in a single session, whole-body workouts are to be longer in duration. These features could also be useful to those with body composition or fat-loss goals.

Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) describes the increased metabolic activity, or calorie burn, that happens following exercise. Higher intensity and longer duration resistance training or interval training are inclined to stimulate greater EPOC.

Although the sensible advantages of EPOC have been questioned, some research has reported a  greater than 10% boost in resting metabolic rate at 14-hours after whole-body strength training. This equated to an additional 168 calories burned on average, which is kind of relevant when added up over several days per week. (10)

Credit: Djordje Mustur / Shutterstock

The entire-body strength training EPOC workout wasn’t a walk within the park — 4 sets of 5 exercises (squat, chest press, pulldown, shoulder press, and split squat) were performed for 30 seconds each (6-7 reps) at 80% of the lifters’ one-repetition maximum with one-minute rest between each movement. The vast majority of fit lifters would require 48 to 72-hours of recovery after a workout of comparable intensity and volume.

Combined with a high-protein, calorie-reduced weight loss plan, whole body strength training produces superior results to weight-reduction plan or lifting alone. (11) Three sessions per week were enough to elicit this effect. But don’t turn your whole-body workout right into a cardio session.

The usage of heavy loads (e.g. heavier than 80% 1RM), at the least intermittently, can be suggested during a weight-reduction plan phase. As bodybuilders in “cutting phases” know well, heavy strength training can assist to guard lean mass in periods of calorie deficit.

For body composition and fat loss, the whole-body approach checks all the boxes. Ideally, hit all major muscle groups three days per week with at the least 48 hours between sessions. If you happen to’re in a position to train more often than three days per week, steady-state aerobic exercise or HIIT workout could also be programmed on non-lifting days. 

Constructing As much as It

You’ve seen many recommendations for training volume and intensity in this text, however it’s prudent to step by step increase training volume and intensity as an alternative of diving head-first right into a drastically different training program.

Credit: MDV Edwards / Shutterstock

rule of thumb is to limit increases in weekly set volume to twenty% of previous regular volume per 30 days. (12) For instance, a lifter who previously trained with eight sets of chest exercises per week might step by step increase to 10 sets over the course of the subsequent 4 weeks.

For lifters who are usually not accustomed to high intensity training, it’s also sensible to step by step expose your body to heavy weights over time (e.g. 2 to 4% increase per week). Deloads could also be programmed as needed.

Split it or Hit it

Deciding on a training split doesn’t should be overly complicated. It comes right down to knowing your training goal, determining how often you’ll consistently show up to coach, and establishing the framework to your program. When you discover the “perfect” split to your lifestyle and training goals, you’ll be well in your solution to consistent gains and progress.

References

1. Androulakis-Korakakis, P., Fisher, J. P., & Steele, J. (2020). The minimum effective training dose required to extend 1RM strength in resistance-trained men: a scientific review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 50(4), 751-765.
2. Schoenfeld, B. J., Grgic, J., & Krieger, J. (2019). How over and over per week should a muscle be trained to maximise muscle hypertrophy? A scientific review and meta-analysis of studies examining the results of resistance training frequency. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(11), 1286-1295.
3. Schoenfeld, B. J., Ogborn, D., & Krieger, J. W. (2017). Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: A scientific review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 35(11), 1073-1082.
4. Ralston, G. W., Kilgore, L., Wyatt, F. B., & Baker, J. S. (2017). The effect of weekly set volume on strength gain: a meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 47(12), 2585-2601.
5. Grgic, J., Schoenfeld, B. J., Davies, T. B., et al. (2018). Effect of resistance training frequency on gains in muscular strength: a scientific review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 48(5), 1207-1220.
6. Brigatto, F. A., de Camargo, J. B. B., Machado, Y. B., et al. (2022). Does split-body resistance training routine performed two versus three days per week induce distinct strength and morphological adaptations in resistance-trained men? A randomized longitudinal study. International Journal of Strength and Conditioning, 2(1).
7. Wewege, M. A., Desai, I., Honey, C., et al. (2021). The effect of resistance training in healthy adults on body fat percentage, fat mass and visceral fat: a scientific review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 1-14.
8. Schoenfeld, B. J., Contreras, B., Krieger, J., et al. (2019). Resistance training volume enhances muscle hypertrophy but not strength in trained men. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 51(1), 94.
9. Lasevicius, T., Ugrinowitsch, C., Schoenfeld, B. J., et al. (2018). Effects of various intensities of resistance training with equated volume load on muscle strength and hypertrophy. European Journal of Sport Science, 18(6), 772-780.
10. Greer, B. K., O’Brien, J., Hornbuckle, L. M., & Panton, L. B. (2021). EPOC comparison between resistance training and high-intensity interval training in aerobically fit women. International Journal of Exercise Science, 14(2), 1027.
11. Miller, T., Mull, S., Aragon, A. A., et al. (2018). Resistance training combined with weight loss plan decreases body fat while preserving lean mass independent of resting metabolic rate: a randomized trial. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 28(1), 46-54.
12. Schoenfeld, B., Fisher, J., Grgic, J., et al. (2021). Resistance training recommendations to maximise muscle hypertrophy in an athletic population: Position stand of the IUSCA. International Journal of Strength and Conditioning, 1(1), 1-30.
13. Bartolomei, S., Nigro, F., Lanzoni, I. M., et al. (2021). A comparison between total body and split routine resistance training programs in trained men. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 35(6), 1520-1526.

Feature Image: Jacob Lund / Shutterstock