The continuing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, attributable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has massively affected the worldwide healthcare sector and the economy. Despite adults being mainly affected by the virus, several cases of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection in pediatric patients have been reported.

Study: Differences in SARS-CoV-2 Clinical Manifestations and Disease Severity in Children and Adolescents by the Infecting Variant. Image Credit: Morrowind / Shutterstock

Background

A broad spectrum of clinical symptoms, resembling asymptomatic, mild upper respiratory distress, pneumonia, and more severe multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), have been reported in children infected with SARS-CoV-2. As well as, it was observed that MIS-C mainly occurred 2-6 weeks after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Because the starting of the pandemic, the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 occurred as a consequence of genomic mutations, which led to the emergence of many variants. These variants have been classified as variants of interest (VOI) and variants of concern (VOC) based on their virulence, ability to flee immune responses, and transmissibility in comparison with the ancestral strain.

Within the US, the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant first replaced the ancestral strain, which was eventually replaced by the Delta variant. Then, around September 2021, the Delta strain was replaced by the Omicron variant, which became the dominantly circulating SARS-CoV-2 strain. 

Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants showed substantially higher transmissibility and disproportionally affected unvaccinated individuals and vulnerable groups, resembling children. These variants significantly increased pediatric hospitalization by 5-fold to 10-fold, depending on the variant and the kid’s age. There’s a scarcity of information on how specific SARS-CoV-2 variants impact the clinical disease severity in adolescents and kids with COVID-19.

A recent Emerging Infectious Diseases journal study evaluated whether specific SARS-CoV-2 variants were linked with different clinical manifestations in children and adolescents.

In regards to the Study

Nasopharyngeal (NP) samples were collected from children and adolescents who tested positive between January 1, 2021, and January 15, 2022, via nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs).

All SARS-CoV-2 positive samples were stored at −20°C; nonetheless, these were analyzed inside every week of storage based on the clinical laboratory testing capability, cycle threshold (Ct) values, and sample volumes. This study used Ct values as a proxy for viral load quantification. Ct value is inversely proportional to quantitative viral load.

The samples were analyzed to detect the presence of mutations characterizing Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Omicron, and other variants. As well as, the authors developed a T487K assay to detect the Delta variant.

The demographic characteristics, comorbidities, the infecting variant type, and SARS-CoV-2 Ct values of the chosen inpatients and outpatients were obtained. The participants were grouped based on their underlying medical conditions, including obesity/underweight, genetic, gastrointestinal, renal, endocrine, neurologic immunocompromised disorders, and hematologic diseases. 

Study Findings

Through the study period, out of the 169,908 samples tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents, 9.02% tested positive by a NAAT assay tested positive. Fluctuations within the monthly COVID-19 cases were observed throughout the study period.

Shifts within the circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants identified at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA, by percentage of total cases no matter patient age, January 2021–January 2022. The others category comprises Beta (n = 12), Iota (n = 9), Zeta (n = 7), Eta (n = 2), Epsilon (n = 3), and Mu (n = 2) variants, in addition to variants under investigation (n = 2). The black dotted line represents the speed of positive tests by month.

Variants screening revealed the presence of twelve SARS-CoV-2 variants, which included nonvariant strain (11.34%), Alpha (11.81%), Delta (62.77%), and Omicron (10.49%). As well as, other SARS-CoV-2 strains, resembling Beta, Zeta, Gamma, Mu, Epsilon, and Eta, were also detected. This finding also revealed that Delta infection was commonest in inpatients and outpatients. Likewise, the Alpha and Omicron variant infections were mostly present in outpatients and inpatients.

The median age of inpatients was 6.6 years, and of outpatients was 9.4 years. Interestingly, each settings revealed that SARS-CoV-2 infection was more prevalent within the adolescent group (12–21 years of age) than in younger children. Nevertheless, infants were the second commonest group with COVID-19. The COVID-19 vaccination rate was low and didn’t differ between inpatients and outpatients. 

The obesity/chubby condition was essentially the most common underlying comorbidity of the study cohort. SARS-CoV-2/viral coinfections were reported in 19.82% of the study cohort. Essentially the most common virus coinfected with COVID-19 was the rhinovirus/enterovirus (RV/EV), followed by the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human metapneumovirus, endemic coronavirus, parainfluenza viruses, adenovirus and influenza viruses. Importantly, coinfection was present in children infected with Delta and Omicron variants. Coinfection also enhanced hospital admission.

Children infected with the Delta variant showed lower Ct values. In contrast to the outcomes documented in existing studies, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission was similar between children infected with Omicron and other variants.

Study Limitations

A key limitation of the study was that each one samples that tested SARS-CoV-2 positive by NAAT weren’t subjected to variant screening. The proportion of sample screening for variant identification was based on samples’ volumes and the provision of expert personnel on the clonal laboratory. Hence, in the course of the months of high SARS-CoV-2 cases, a smaller variety of samples underwent variant testing. One other limitation was the retrospective nature of the info collection, which influenced the findings of the outpatient cohort.